Mikel Arteta Challenges Premier League Officiating and Defends Arsenal

  • Mikel Arteta has no intention of staying silent when he believes an officiating decision has gone against Arsenal.

The Spanish manager once again defended his right to publicly question some refereeing decisions in the Premier League, a stance that led Jamie Carragher to compare him to Sir Alex Ferguson, who was also known for putting pressure on match officials during his historic spell at Manchester United.

The debate began after Arsenal’s victory over Sunderland, a match in which a controversial penalty was awarded against Ezri Konsa following an incident involving Dan Ballard.

Arteta described the decision as “unacceptable” and argued that the Sunderland player had initiated the contact.

His comments generated enough attention for Carragher to later suggest that the Arsenal manager is becoming a figure with an influence comparable to the one Ferguson once had in the Premier League.


Arteta Rejects Being the New Ferguson

The Spaniard, however, preferred to distance himself from the comparison.

“No. I’m here to try to give my opinion, to defend my club and to give the very best to our players,” Arteta explained during his press conference.

The manager acknowledged that he can also make mistakes, but insisted that his intention is to be as fair as possible when discussing refereeing decisions.

For Arteta, managers, players, referees and governing bodies all share a responsibility to help English football improve.

“It’s everybody’s duty to try and improve the game and that’s what we are here for,” he added.

The manager’s stance comes at a particularly sensitive moment for officiating in the Premier League.


VAR Error in Manchester Derby Adds to the Debate

The controversy surrounding Arsenal emerged at almost the same time as one of the most significant refereeing mistakes of the early season.

Pro Ref acknowledged that Erling Haaland’s goal, which decided Manchester City’s 1-0 victory over Manchester United in the Manchester derby, should not have been allowed to stand.

The goal had initially been ruled out for Haaland being offside, but VAR determined that the striker was in an onside position. The problem involved Enzo Fernández, who was standing in an offside position and attempted to play the cross before the ball reached the Norwegian.

Pro Ref later admitted that VAR had failed to properly assess Enzo Fernández’s impact on Lisandro Martínez and that referee Michael Oliver should have been sent to the monitor to review the incident.

Howard Webb, Pro Ref’s head of refereeing, publicly acknowledged that allowing the goal to stand was a mistake.

Arsenal Also Sought an Explanation

Following what happened against Sunderland, Arsenal contacted Pro Ref to discuss the penalty decision.

Arteta, however, refused to reveal the details of those conversations and insisted that they should remain private.

For the Spaniard, it is not simply about receiving an apology.

“It’s just agreeing that the decision should have been different or not, maybe they have a different opinion. Try to improve and move forward together,” he explained.

That is precisely the position Arteta intends to maintain.

He accepts that his opinions can generate debate and even acknowledges that he will make mistakes himself. But as long as he believes a decision has affected Arsenal, he will continue to speak out.

The comparison with Sir Alex Ferguson can wait. Arteta insists his objective is much simpler: to defend his team.

Mikel Arteta Amatriain
Mikel Arteta Amatriain
Arsenal FC